Legal Opinion
Loving v. City of St. Joseph
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided May 10, 1988No. WD 39991PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TURNAGE, Judge.
Kim Loving and his wife, Cathy, filed suit against the City of St. Joseph and the St. Joseph Tennis Foundation seeking a declaratory judgment that fees charged for the use ■ of municipal tennis courts were contrary to Article X, Section 22 of the Missouri Constitution. The court dismissed the cause for failure to state a cause of action upon which relief could be granted. Reversed and remanded.
The Lovings alleged that they were residents and taxpayers of the City of St. Joseph and that the City is a municipal corporation. The St. Joseph Tennis Foundation is a not-for-profit…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Roberts v. McNarySupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- State Ex Rel. Askew v. KoppSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
- Manufacturer's Casualty Ins. Co. v. Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
- City of Washington v. ReedMissouri Court of Appeals · 1934
- City of Meadville v. CaselmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Keller v. Marion County Ambulance DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- Missouri Municipal League v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
- City of Lexington v. SeatonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- Grace v. St. Louis CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- Myers v. ScottMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.