Legal Opinion

City of Lexington v. Seaton

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 19, 1991No. WD 43886PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOWENSTEIN, Chief Judge.

The City of Lexington (“City”), operating a sewer treatment plant, sued the Defendants for unpaid sewer bills and received a money judgment of nearly $10,000. The charges were imposed on users by the City to pay off previously issued revenue bonds. The Defendants appealed the judgment on the grounds that 1) the sewer charge was not lawfully imposed because the City did not give proper notice of public hearings on the charge, 2) the underlying sewer bonds were unauthorized because the City’s bond issue had failed, 3) the failure of the election led to the sewer charges…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Roberts v. McNarySupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  2. Baker v. BakerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. MacOn-atlanta State Bank v. GallMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Larabee v. WashingtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Bowen v. HixonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mullenix - St. Charles Properties, L.P. v. City of St. CharlesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Lapponese v. Carts of Colorado, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Tate v. Golden Rule Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Seaton v. City of LexingtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. State of Missouri ex rel Sheriff Paul Vescovo III v. Clay County, MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API