Legal Opinion

City of Meadville v. Caselman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 6, 1950PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroaddus, J.

The sole question presented here is the power and authority of’ a city of the fourth class to prohibit pool halls altogether within its corporate limits.

This suit for a declaratory judgment was instituted in the Circuit Court of Linn County, the plaintiffs being the City of Meadville, Lester Collins, as Mayor and Leland Tharp, Lee Woods, Ola L. Belcher and Stanley Duncan as Board of Aldermen of the City of Meadville.

The petition alleged that the City of Meadville was a municipal corporation, being a city of the fourth class. It alleged the official capacity of the other plaintiffs as above…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Kiley v. OppenheimerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  2. Leach v. CargillSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
  3. State ex rel. Sheffel v. McCammonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905
  4. City of St. Louis v. KingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  5. State Ex Rel. Wagner v. FieldsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1924

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Polk v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  2. State Ex Rel. Sims v. EckhardtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  3. Stevenson v. Salt Lake City CorporationUtah Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Loving v. City of St. JosephMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. State Ex Rel. Jack Frost Abattoirs, Inc. v. SteinbachMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API