Legal Opinion
Lissie v. Southern New England Telephone Co.
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided March 12, 1976No. FILE NO. 71PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSponzo, J.
Pursuant to § 606 of the Practice Book, both of these actions have been joined and combined for the purpose of this appeal. There is very little dispute about the material facts in these eases. The plaintiffs were employed by the defendant in its commercial department located on the second floor of a two-story structure maintained by it in the North Meadows area of Hartford. The plaintiffs were not permitted to leave their coats by their desks or in their working area. Because there were no facilities available for the plaintiffs’ coats on the second floor, they were assigned one of two areas…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- National Broadcasting Co. v. RoseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- Malone v. SantoraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
- State v. SkinnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
- Frissell v. John W. Rogers, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Schleisner Co. v. BirchettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1953
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Griffin v. Nationwide Moving & Storage Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Central Rubber Products, Inc. v. Stafford Higgins Industries, Inc. (In Re Central Rubber Products, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1983
- Hartmann v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- MacHinists Automotive Trades District Lodge No. 190 v. Utility Trailer Sales Co.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- Miller v. Newsweek, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.