Legal Opinion
MacHinists Automotive Trades District Lodge No. 190 v. Utility Trailer Sales Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 21, 1983No. Civ. 53204PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FEINBERG, J.
On this appeal by an employee (Bowers) and his union, Machinists Automotive Trades District Lodge No. 190 of Northern California *82(Union), from an adverse judgment, the only question is whether Labor Code section 28021 provides a statutory right to indemnity from the employer, Utility Trailer Sales Company (Employer), for the loss of Bowers’ tools in a weekend burglary of the Employer’s premises. For the reasons set forth below we have concluded that Bowers was entitled to indemnity and we reverse.
The facts were not in dispute and were found as follows by the court: Bowers,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Springer v. Government of Philippine IslandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Industrial Welfare Commission v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- John Garibaldi v. Lucky Food Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Gattuso v. Harte-Hanks Shoppers, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
- Orange Cnty. Water Dist. v. Alcoa Global Fasteners, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Grissom v. Vons Companies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1991
- In Re Work Uniform CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.