Legal Opinion

Tower Ins. Co., Inc. v. Carpenter

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided October 2, 1996No. 95-2932PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSnyder, J.

Tower Insurance Company, Inc., appeals from a judgment awarding Gary Carpenter $50,000 in underinsured motorist (UIM) benefits on the following grounds: (1) that the Tower policy does not provide UIM coverage; (2) that Tower is entitled to the return of its $50,000 payment because it was a mistake; and (3) that the doctrine of accord and satisfaction is not applicable. Because Tower's payment of $50,000 was a final negotiated settlement of Carpenter's claim, we affirm the trial court.

Carpenter's wife, Sandra, was killed in an automobile accident in January 1994. American Family Mutual…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. First National Leasing Corp. v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Smith v. Atlantic Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Vogt v. SchroederWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Flambeau Products Corp. v. Honeywell Information Systems, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Armstrong v. Milwaukee Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. WaltersCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
  2. Kiss v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
  3. Dussault v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
  4. Schuetta v. Aurora National Life Assurance Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2014
  5. Zabel v. Schroeder Oil, Inc. (In Re Zabel)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API