United States v. Tillinghast
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1ConcurrenceWilson, Circuit Judge
I concur in the result of the majority opinion, but on the ground that the government has not shown that there was any excess profits tax due. The finding of the Commissioner is only prima facie evidence of its correctness, and it may be overcome by evidence by the taxpayer, which the District Court found was clearly overcome in this ease. I think his finding must stand. The government then failed, in a suit to recover taxes, to show that there was any tax due and its suit was properly dismissed by the District Court.
It is, therefore, not necessary to consider whether the statute of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Clement Gunn v. The United States of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Beam v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923
- United States v. UpdikeDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1924
- McDonnell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
- Atterbury v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932