Legal Opinion

Atterbury v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 31, 1932No. L-135PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LITTLETON, Judge.

Plaintiff contends that the filing of the return of income, form 1065, was sufficient to start the running of the statute of limitation on its excess profits tax liability, and that therefore the excess profits tax of $15,751.36 for 1918 was collected one month after the expiration of the statute of limitation of five years from the date on which the return of income, form 1065, was filed.

The Commissioner held, and the defendant hero contends, that the return of income, form 1065, filed April 1, 1918, was not sufficient to start the running of the Statute of limitation on the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McDonnell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. TillinghastCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API