Legal Opinion

Beam v. Hamilton

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 15, 1923No. 3787PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNAPPEN, Circuit Judge.

This writ brings up for review a judgment rendered in favor of the collector in a suit by plaintiff in error to recover a penalty of 50 per cent, assessed (and paid under protest) for alleged failure to make a return under the Revenue Act of October 3, 1917 (40 Stat. 300 [Comp. St. 1918, § 6336%a et seq.]). During that calendar year (and for many years before) plaintiff in error was the vice president and general manager of a distillery, for which service he received an annual salary of $4,200. On his shares of stock therein he drew dividends of $18,000. He was also on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lehnen v. DicksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Vicksburg, Shreveport & Pacific Railway Co. v. Anderson-Tully Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Mason v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
  4. National Surety Co. v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1906

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Updike v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  2. O'Sullivan Rubber Co. v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  3. Edmonds v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
  4. McDonnell v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1927
  5. United States v. TillinghastCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1934

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API