Joseph Weill & Co. v. Kent
Supreme Court of Louisiana
APPEAL from the 20th Judicial District Court, Parish of Lafourche. — L. P. Gaillouet, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Provosty, J.
When this case was before us the first time, see 52 Ann,, 2139, we held that the furnisher of necessary supplies’ privilege “on the crops of the year and the proceeds thereof,” is not divested by a sale, private or judicial, of the plantation while the crop is growing; but that the crop passes to the purchaser subject to the privilege; and we held that the privilege need not be recorded in order to affect third persons, the crop quoad the privilege being a movable, and privileges on movables not needing to be recorded. Furthermore,…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Loeb v. CollierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
- Union Seed & Fertilizer Co. v. J. Supple's Sons Planting Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
- Alexandria Production Credit Ass'n v. HornLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1940
- Purity Feed Mills Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- Roger v. Milliken & FarwellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.