Driggers v. Pearson
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
The present writ of error was taken" to a judgment of the lower court, remanding the plaintiff, Driggers, to the custody of the sheriff, entered after the hearing on a writ of habeas corpus issued in the cause following a citation of contempt for failure to pay alimony pendente lite and attorney’s fees as ordered by the court. Suit was originally instituted by Maud Driggers by the filing of a bill in the nature of a “bill for separate maintenance,” under Section 4988 C. G. L., alleging extreme and repeated cruelty. Incorporated in the bill was a petition for alimony pendente lite and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lovett and Lovett v. LovettSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
- Chisholm v. ChisholmSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
- Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Florida · 1894
- Palmer v. PalmerSupreme Court of Florida · 1891
- Condon v. CondonSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Calicchio v. CalicchioDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Goldstein v. NavarroDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991