Legal Opinion

Driggers v. Pearson

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 5, 1940PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The present writ of error was taken" to a judgment of the lower court, remanding the plaintiff, Driggers, to the custody of the sheriff, entered after the hearing on a writ of habeas corpus issued in the cause following a citation of contempt for failure to pay alimony pendente lite and attorney’s fees as ordered by the court. Suit was originally instituted by Maud Driggers by the filing of a bill in the nature of a “bill for separate maintenance,” under Section 4988 C. G. L., alleging extreme and repeated cruelty. Incorporated in the bill was a petition for alimony pendente lite and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lovett and Lovett v. LovettSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  2. Chisholm v. ChisholmSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
  3. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Florida · 1894
  4. Palmer v. PalmerSupreme Court of Florida · 1891
  5. Condon v. CondonSupreme Court of Florida · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Calicchio v. CalicchioDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  2. Goldstein v. NavarroDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API