Legal Opinion

Goldstein v. Navarro

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 27, 1991No. 91-1622Published

1Per curiam

In accordance with a prior order of this court, this petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied.

Several months prior to petitioner’s arrest and incarceration, the trial court entered a civil contempt order against the petitioner for his failure to pay alimony. The order, which was based upon a mas*21ter’s report and findings1, found that the petitioner was $235,000 in arrears. The contempt order provided for the petitioner’s commitment, and for a purge payment.

The master’s report upon which the contempt order was founded made no specific finding concerning petitioner’s ability to pay the purge…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bowen v. BowenSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. Pabian v. PabianDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  3. LeNeve v. NavarroDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  4. Driggers v. PearsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
  5. Jerome v. JeromeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API