District of Columbia v. Weams
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Chief Judge:
Appellees were separately charged with disorderly conduct. When the cases came on for joint trial on August 6, 1964, a continuance was requested by the prosecuting attorney because of the unavailability of a government witness. After a discussion between the trial judge and counsel for both sides respecting a possible stipulation as to the absent witness’s testimony, the court ordered a recess. When court reconvened, the prosecuting attorney announced he had -nol-prossed all cases. When the right to do so was challenged by defense attorneys, the trial judge refused to accept…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DascalakisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- People Ex Rel. Elliott v. CovelliIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
- State Ex Inf. McKittrick v. GravesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
- Ex Parte AltmanDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1940
- State v. CharlesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. BraunsdorfWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- United States v. Andrew FureyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- United States v. FosterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
- James H. White, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- State v. SimmsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.