Legal Opinion

District of Columbia v. Weams

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 31, 1965No. 3600-3609PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Chief Judge:

Appellees were separately charged with disorderly conduct. When the cases came on for joint trial on August 6, 1964, a continuance was requested by the prosecuting attorney because of the unavailability of a government witness. After a discussion between the trial judge and counsel for both sides respecting a possible stipulation as to the absent witness’s testimony, the court ordered a recess. When court reconvened, the prosecuting attorney announced he had -nol-prossed all cases. When the right to do so was challenged by defense attorneys, the trial judge refused to accept…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DascalakisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  2. People Ex Rel. Elliott v. CovelliIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
  3. State Ex Inf. McKittrick v. GravesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  4. Ex Parte AltmanDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1940
  5. State v. CharlesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. BraunsdorfWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. United States v. Andrew FureyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  3. United States v. FosterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. James H. White, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  5. State v. SimmsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API