Legal Opinion
Dreyer & Reinbold, Inc. v. AutoXchange. Com., Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided July 19, 2002No. 49A02-0201-CV-19PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAKER, Judge.
Third-party defendant-appellant Dreyer & Reinbold, Inc., (Dreyer & Reinbold) appeals the trial court's denial of its Motion to Have Matter Deemed Admitted and its Motion to Strike third party plaintiff-ap-pellees Donald Tabor and AutoX-change.Com., Inc.'s (collectively "AutoX-change") Answer to its Counterclaim. Specifically, Dreyer & Reinbold claims that because AutoXchange failed to timely respond to its counterclaim, all matters alleged therein should have been deemed admitted pursuant to Ind. Trial Rule 8(D), and that AutoXchange's untimely Answer should have been…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. AndersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Rumfelt v. HimesIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
- Noble County v. RogersIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- City of Evansville v. ZirkelbachIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Clark County State Bank v. BennettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- DiMaggio v. RosarioIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Montgomery v. Indiana Department of CorrectionIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Franklin Collection Service, Inc. v. BancorpSouth BankMississippi Supreme Court · 2019
- Jane Doe v. Kristan P. ReibelIndiana Court of Appeals · 2026
- Kevin L. Martin v. Discover Bank (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.