Legal Opinion
DiMaggio v. Rosario
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided June 21, 2011No. 64A03-1009-PL-500PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KIRSCH, Judge.
Victor J. DiMaggio III (“DiMaggio”) appeals the trial court’s order dismissing his complaint for usurpation of a corporate opportunity against Liberty Lake Estates, LLC (“LLE”), Mark Nebel (“Nebel”), and William C. Haak (“Haak”) (collectively “the Appellees”) and Elias Rosario (“Rosario”). DiMaggio raises the following restated issue for our review: whether the trial court erred when it dismissed his complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted on the grounds that Indiana does not recognize a cause of action against a third-party non-fiduciary…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Steelvest, Inc. v. Scansteel Service Center, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1991
- Barth v. BarthIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- Raines v. ToneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
- Charter One Mortgage Corp. v. CondraIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
- Hartung v. Architects Hartung/Odle/Burke, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Crystal Valley Sales, Inc. v. AndersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- Victor J. DiMaggio III v. Elias Rosario Elias Rosario v. Victor J. DiMiaggio IIIIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- Michael Kent Smith v. Thomas L. Taulman, IIIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- Abrams v. McGuirewoods, LLPDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2014
- Crystal Valley Sales, Inc., Charles Kline, and Nancy Kline v. Jonathan Anderson, National Sales Company, Inc., Rodger Anderson, Camco Manufacturing, and Norm GeibleIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.