Legal Opinion

City of Evansville v. Zirkelbach

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 11, 1996No. 82A01-9508-CV-261PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAKER, Judge.

Appellant-defendant City of Evansville, Indiana, (City) challenges the trial court's decision ordering it to reinstate appellee-plaintiff Adam V. Zirkelbach on the eligibility list for appointment to the Evansville Police Department (Department). In this appeal, the City raises one issue for review: whether pursuant to Evansville City Ordinance 8.30.37.514, an applicant for appointment to the Department must be twenty-one years of age at the time he or she files an application for appointment.

FACTS

The undisputed facts are that Zirkelbach, who was twenty years of age, filed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Matter of LawranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Hinshaw v. Board of Com'rs of Jay CountyIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Peele v. GillespieIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Uhl v. Liter's Quarry of Indiana, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Kelly v. Ladywood ApartmentsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Foster v. Evergreen Healthcare, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Russell v. RussellIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Blackmon v. DuckworthIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Whetzel v. Department of Local Government FinanceIndiana Tax Court · 2002
  5. Ad Craft, Inc. v. Board of Zoning AppealsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API