Legal Opinion

United States v. McElyea

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided July 24, 1986No. CM 448508PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

RABY, Senior Judge:

Appellant asserts that the military judge erred in denying an alleged defense motion to dismiss for lack of speedy trial. We disagree.

Appellant was timely brought to trial about 56 days after charges were preferred against him, 118 days after he was placed in administrative restriction and 119 days from the date of his apprehension by agents of the local Criminal Investigation Command Office. We are satisfied that the government did not violate Rule for Courts-Martial [hereinafter cited as RCM] 707(a).

We are further convinced, based on our examination of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. BurtonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
  2. United States v. BlairU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1986
  3. United States v. SchilfUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  4. United States v. SmithU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
  5. Washington v. GreenwaldU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. McCallisterU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987
  2. United States v. FriersonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989
  3. United States v. RiverasotoU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989
  4. United States v. McCallisterU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987
  5. United States v. StevensUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API