Legal Opinion

Darrick Martinez v. Rosie Garcia

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 13, 2004No. 02-56678PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge.

We presume that a jury follows the instructions given by the trial court. Ho v. Carey, 332 F.3d 587, 594 (9th Cir.2003). When the instructions, however, combine two theories of guilt, one of which is untenable, and we cannot discern upon which theory the jury convicted, structural error has occurred. The state court’s decision upholding Martinez’s conviction was contrary to clearly established federal law. Accordingly, the district court’s denial of Martinez’s habeas petition challenging Count 2 of his conviction is reversed. 1 For reasons stated in the memorandum…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Boyde v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Frantz v. HazeyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. Kincaid-ChaunceyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. Townsend v. KnowlesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. Frantz v. HazeyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Bains LLC v. Arco Products Co., Div. of Atlantic Richfield Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API