Friedman v. Murphey
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the First Judicial District, in and for the County of Pima. John H. Campbell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
This case has been in this court once before. 12 Ariz. 268, 100 Pac. 801. The former decision on all questions raised and decided is the law of the case. We make reference to that case for a general statement of the facts. We will add as we go along any other facts in the present record that máy be necessary to explain or elucidate the questions to be decided by us.
1. Appellant, defendant below, complains because the court sustained a demurrer to his plea in abatement. This plea was the same as in the former trial, amplified to meet certain suggestions and criticisms of the court, which…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Metcalf v. BarkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Morgan v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Murphey v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1909
- In re RohrerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
- Weil v. McWhorterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Madden v. La CofskeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
- Western States Securities Co. v. MosherArizona Supreme Court · 1925