Legal Opinion

Madden v. La Cofske

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 10, 1934No. 7322PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAWTELLE, Circuit Judge.

On March 14, 1932, the appellant, upon his appointment by the court below as ancillary receiver of the Piggly-Wiggly Yuma Company, a corporation, took into his posses*603sion, as such receiver, the company’s grocery business in Yuma, Ariz. The grocery business was earned on in a building leased by the company from the appellee, under two leases expiring on July 1, 1934, and October 6, 1934, at a monthly rental of $350.

The appellant conducted the grocery business until November 16, 1932, when he delivered it to Herman J. Schwartz, for $2,250. The appellant paid the appellee…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Bell v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Mitchell v. OvermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. New York City Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912
  4. United States Trust Co. v. Wabash Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Borer v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1887

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Wil-Low CafeteriasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  2. Anes v. Crown Partnership, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1997
  3. North Kansas City Bridge & R. v. LenessCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
  4. Siegel v. SchulteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API