Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Central Oregon Irrigation District

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 11, 1988No. 37507-WE; CA A40845PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

Defendant appeals and plaintiff cross-appeals in this action arising out of defendant’s alleged failure to reinstate plaintiff to his former position or to another position in defendant’s employ when he sought to return to work after suffering a compensable injury. Plaintiff states three claims (called “counts” in his pleadings): first, that defendant violated ORS 659.415 by not restoring him to his former position or, if it was unavailable, to another “available and suitable” position; second, that defendant violated ORS 659.410 by discriminating against plaintiff with respect to terms or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Holien v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Knapp v. City of North BendOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Transpacific Leasing, Inc. v. Klineline Sand & Gravel Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Farrimond v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  2. Westwood Corp., Developers & Contractors v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. Spurgeon v. Stayton Canning Co. Cooperative, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  4. Anderson v. Hibu, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2014
  5. Lane County v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API