Legal Opinion

Sedbury v. . Duffy

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 27, 1912PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Civil action to recover the balance due on a note.

It appeared that on 3 March, 1909, defendants R. N. Duffy and A. C. Burnett executed their note to D. H. Green for $5,000; that there had been a payment thereon of $1,000 and the remainder, or $4,000, was due at the time of suit brought; that some time prior to institution of action D. H. Green sold the note to plaintiff for $3,200 and the purchaser required the indorsement of the payee, Green, and H. T. Pratt as guarantee of payment. The indorsers having pleaded that as to them this was an usurious transaction, issues were submitted. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. National Bank v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Sayers v. WallSupreme Court of Virginia · 1875
  3. Ballinger v. . EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1847
  4. Bynum v. . RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1857
  5. Collier v. . NevillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1831

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. O. A. Graybeal Co. v. CookCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. Western Auto Supply Co. v. VickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Pratt v. American Bond & Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  4. Western Auto Supply Co. v. VickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API