Legal Opinion

Western Auto Supply Co. v. Vick

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 5, 1981No. 11PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Justice.

The Court of Appeals held that the transactions between the parties which gave rise to defendant’s counterclaim involved the payment of interest in return for the forbearance of money owed on account. Accordingly, the court concluded that the North Carolina usury statutes governed the conduct of the parties in the transfer of the chattel paper under the purchase agreement. In particular, the Court of Appeals directed its attention to two of the findings of fact which had been made by the trial court and excepted to by defendant. The challenged findings are:

10. Without regard to…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Henderson v. SECURITY MORTAGAGE AND FINANCE CO.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Thompson v. SolesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Carper v. Kanawha Banking & Trust Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1974

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. NCCS Loans, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  2. Swindell v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  3. Cross v. Capital Transaction Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  4. Odell v. Legal Bucks, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  5. Berger v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API