Legal Opinion

McMahon v. Anaconda Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1984No. 81-034PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Morrison

George D. McMahon (claimant) appeals from orders of the Workers’ Compensation Court denying benefits under the Occupational Disease Act and the Workers’ Compensation Act. Claimant sought benefits under both Acts simultaneously in separate proceedings. The two cases have been consolidated for purposes of appeal. We remand for further proceedings.

Claimant worked at the Anaconda Company’s copper refinery in Great Falls from 1956 through December 6, 1978 as an inspector. During this period, claimant was continuously exposed to moderate levels of sulphuric acid, organic arsenic, zinc, lead,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hert v. JJ Newberry Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Hoehne v. Granite Lumber Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Romero v. Standard Metals CorporationColorado Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Schumacher v. Empire Steel Manufacturing Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Davis v. DyncorpCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. Bremer v. BuerkleMontana Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Welch v. American Mine Services, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Wear v. Buttrey Foods Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Bodily v. John Jump Trucking, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API