Legal Opinion

Allen v. Winstandly

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1893No. 16,351PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From the Pike Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHackney, J.

The appellee sought and secured, in the trial court, an injunction against the appellant Allen as an execution creditor, and against Stilwell as the sheriff holding such execution. The complaint alleged a judgment of the Morgan Circuit Court, in favor of Allen, for $2,750, against one Jesse A. Mitchell; that upon execution issued on that judgment, the appellants had levied, and would sell, unless restrained, certain mules, cattle, and corn, the property of the appellee, as the property of said Mitchell; that appellee was not a party to said judgment, nor to the suit in which it was obtained,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Champ v. KendrickIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Comby v. McMichaelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1851
  3. Denny v. DennyIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Trueblood v. HollingsworthIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Elson v. O'DowdIndiana Supreme Court · 1872

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Xenia Real Estate Co. v. MacyIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Ross v. BantaIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Northwestern Fire & Marine Insurance v. Connecticut Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  4. Wabash Railroad v. EnglemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Gas Light & Coke Co. v. City of New AlbanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1894

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API