Legal Opinion
Brill v. Wagner
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 5, 1957PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNicholas M. Pette, J.
Plaintiff moves for an order to examine Robert F. Wagner, individually and as Mayor of the City of New York, and Nelson Seitel, individually and as administrative assistant to the Mayor of the City of New York. The City of New York appears to be the only defendant in this action, Mayor Robert F. Wagner and Nelson Seitel not having been served with any summons or complaint herein. The defendant City of New York cross-moves to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The city has interposed an answer to the *769complaint…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- McDonald v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Dyer v. Broadway Central BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Lindlots Realty Corp. v. County of SuffolkNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- New York City Employees' Retirement System v. EliotNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Smith v. . City of NewburghNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Steiner Egg Noodle Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1969
- Dour v. Village of Port JeffersonNew York Supreme Court · 1976
- Janosko v. KrossNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Prospect Enterprises, Inc. v. PeopleNew York Supreme Court · 1974
- Joseph A. Cicci, Inc. v. AllansonNew York Supreme Court · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.