Legal Opinion

Janosko v. Kross

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1960PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamuel M. G-old, J.

This is purportedly an article 78 (Civ. Prac. Act) proceeding to direct respondent Commissioner of Correction to correct records concerning the commitment of petitioner, who is presently an inmate of Auburn State Prison. Petitioner contends that he should have been credited with *211588 days of detention in Manhattan City Prison instead of the 437 days actually credited.

On October 29, 1955 petitioner was committed to said Manhattan City Prison on a charge of burglary in the third degree, allegedly committed in New York County. On February 6,1956 a warrant for petitioner’s arrest on a robbery…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. New York City Employees' Retirement System v. EliotNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  2. Bernoff v. AmorosoNew York Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Lord & Burnham Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  4. Schuster v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Brill v. WagnerNew York Supreme Court · 1957

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Henderson v. CassclesNew York Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Dour v. Village of Port JeffersonNew York Supreme Court · 1976
  3. People v. Vitale, New York County Courts1974
  4. Prospect Enterprises, Inc. v. PeopleNew York Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Bergamini v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API