Legal Opinion

Taal v. Hannaford Bros.

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided January 19, 2006No. CV-05-82-PBPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Taal v. Hannaford Bros. CV-05-82-PB 01/19/06 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Jai Taal v. Case No. 05-cv-82-PB Opinion No.

2006 DNH 004

Hannaford Bros. C o . MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Pro se plaintiff Jai Taal alleges that her former employer, Hannaford Bros. Co. ("Hannaford"), engaged in acts of racial discrimination in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981. Hannaford moves for summary judgment, arguing that Taal's claims are either barred by the applicable statute of limitations or there is no evidence to support them. Taal objects and has filed her own motion for summary…

2Cases cited13 opinions

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.