Goldman v. State Ex Rel. Thomas
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtDudine, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment rendered against appellant in a bastardy proceeding.
The overruling of appellant’s motion for new trial is the sole error relied upon for reversal.
The causes for new trial assigned in the motion therefor, and discussed in appellant’s brief, are: (1) The
verdict is not sustained by sufficient evidence; (2) errors in the giving of certain instructions.
One of the instructions given by the court, and complained of by appellant, reads as follows :
“If you find from the evidence that the relatrix had intercourse with some person or persons, other than the defendant,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kintner v. State ex rel. RipperdanIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Michael v. State ex rel. PearsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
- Whitman v. State ex rel. HemmingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
- Goodwine v. State ex rel. DoveIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
3Cited by6 opinions
- Beaman v. HedrickIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970
- Roe v. DoeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
- Def v. EmIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
- Oq v. LrIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- D.E.F. v. E.M.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.