Whitman v. State ex rel. Hemminger
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Harrison Circuit Court.
1Per curiam
This was a prosecution for bastardy. There was a trial by the court, a finding that the defendant was the father of the child, a motion for a new trial overruled, and judgment charging the defendant with the maintenance and education of the child.
The reason for the motion for a new trial was, that the finding of the court was contrary to law, and not sustained by the evidence. All the evidence is put in the record by a bill of exceptions.
The only error assigned is, that the court improperly refused to grant a new trial on the application of the defendant.
As we think the circuit court should…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- O'Brian v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
- Townsend v. State ex rel. HoshourIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
3Cited by10 opinions
- Beaman v. HedrickIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970
- Eckhart v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Kintner v. State ex rel. RipperdanIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Smith v. YaryanIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Michael v. State ex rel. PearsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.