Legal Opinion

Kintner v. State ex rel. Ripperdan

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1873PublishedCited by 19 opinions

From the Harrison Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDowney, C. J.

This was a prosecution for bastardy. ■ On a trial by jury, the defendant was found to be the father of the child. He moved for a new trial. His motion was overruled, and judgment was rendered against him for the support of the child. The only error properly assigned is the overruling of the motion for a' new trial.

We need not set out the evidence which was given on the trial. The paternity of the child rested between the defendant and Wesley Ripperdan, another young man, an uncle of the prosecuting witness. The question was by no means free from doubt, judging from the evidence in the record.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jeffersonville Railroad v. SwiftIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Carter v. PomeroyIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Swank v. Nichols' AdministratorIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  4. Whitman v. State ex rel. HemmingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
  5. Shank v. State ex rel. RobinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1865

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Wilson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Newport v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. McNutt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
  4. Barker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  5. State v. . SwinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API