Legal Opinion

Kendall Co. v. Tetley Tea Co., Inc

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided June 1, 1951No. 4547_1PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAGRUDER, Chief Judge.

In this patent infringement suit, the court below gave judgment for the defendant upon a holding that the claims in suit are invalid. 89 F.Supp. 897. The patent in question, No. 2,277,050, is a product patent for an infuser, particularly a tea bag. It was applied for by Raymond E. Reed and John F. Ryan, designated as joint inventors, and was issued on March 24, 1942, to appellant herein, The Kendall Company, as assignee. The Kendall Company, a manufacturer of various woven and non-woven fabrics, does not itself manufacture tea bags, but it does manufacture a fabric known…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hotchkiss v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  2. Smith v. Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Alexander Milburn Co. v. Davis-Bournonville Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Western States MacH. Co. v. S. S. Hepworth Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  5. Dwight & Lloyd Sintering Co. v. GreenawaltCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Shields v. Halliburton Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1980
  2. JOHN BLUE COMPANY v. Dempster Mill Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1958
  3. Vanderhorst Corporation of America v. Chromium Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  4. Heden v. HillDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1996
  5. Shields v. Halliburton Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API