Legal Opinion

Ruggles v. . Chapman

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 1, 1874PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In each of these cases the substantial question is presented by the claim of the plaintiff to require from the superintendent of the insurance department, a transfer of certain securities which he holds in his official character. The plaintiff is a receiver appointed by the New York Common Pleas, in the exercise of its equitable jurisdiction, at the suit of a stockholder and creditor of the Eclectic Life Insurance Company, in a suit to establish its insolvency, and procure its dissolution, and the distribution of its assets. The securities which the defendant holds, were placed in his hands…

2Cited by21 opinions

  1. Morrill v. American Reserve Bond Co. of KentuckyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · 1907
  2. Brackett v. Middlesex Banking Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
  3. In re the Directors of the Binghamton General Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. Smyth v. . MunroeNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  5. People Ex Rel. Ruggles v. . ChapmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1876

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API