Legal Opinion

Tucker v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 18, 1980No. 206-78PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKashiwa, Judge

In this action plaintiff, by seeking reinstatement and back pay, challenges the correctness of his removal as an employee of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).1 The parties are presently before this court on cross motions for summary judgment. Defendant asks us to hold that plaintiffs removal was proper. There being no genuine issue as to any material fact, for the reasons set out below we grant defendant’s motion. Doing so being dispositive of this action, we also dismiss plaintiffs petition in its entirety.

In 1963 plaintiff began working as an air traffic controller at the Air Route…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Power v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  2. Charles H. Young v. Robert E. HamptonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  3. Boyce v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  4. Rifkin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  5. ShapleyUnited States Court of Claims · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Loyce E. Hayes v. Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  2. Gerald L. Naekel v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  3. Donald H. Kumferman v. Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  4. Nibali v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
  5. Robert L. Bradley, Jr. v. Veterans AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API