Legal Opinion

Rifkin v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 14, 1976No. 437-70PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

Plaintiff, while employed as a civilian at the United States Army Procurement Center, Frankfurt, Germany, was charged with the offense of “altering and using an official document to defraud the United States” and was subsequently removed from his position as comptroller, GS-12, Step 3, in 1965. Plaintiff, who appears pro se, sues for *570back pay and reinstatement from April 1965. Defendant urges that there is no merit to plaintiff’s claim, and that suit not having been filed until December 8, 1970, in any event the claim is barred by the doctrine of laches.

Defendant’s motion for…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Grover v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
  2. Power v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  3. Frank Camero v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  4. Cason v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
  5. Cuiffo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Charles H. Young v. Robert E. HamptonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  2. Pascal v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  3. Giles v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
  4. Boyce v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  5. Rasmussen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API