Legal Opinion

Lusk v. Daewon America, Inc.

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided June 11, 2020No. 3:18-cv-00884Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION HUGH LUSK, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CASE No. 3:18-cv-00884-RAH-SMD ) (WO) DAEWON AMERICA, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Hugh Lusk (“Lusk” or “Plaintiff”), a resident of Lee County, Alabama, was employed as an “EDI Clerk” at the Auburn warehouse of Daewon America, Inc. (“Daewon”) until he was terminated on October 24, 2017. (Doc. 1 at 6.) As both Daewon and Lusk agree (collectively, “Parties”), Daewon fired Lusk not because of any performance or disciplinary issues but because of…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Calero-Cerezo v. U.S. Dep of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  5. Smith v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API