Legal Opinion

Truck Insurance Exchange v. Bishara

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1996No. 21646PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TROUT, Justice.

This is a declaratory judgment action in which Truck Insurance Exchange (Truck) seeks a judicial declaration that it did not act in bad faith in refusing to enter into a settlement agreement with an injured third party.

I

BACKGROUND

The Dotys purchased an automobile from the Bisharas in 1985 upon which new tires had been installed by Elias Bishara approximately one year earlier. Shortly after purchasing the vehicle, two of the tires on the automobile failed while the Dotys were traveling through Arizona, causing the vehicle to roll over. The accident resulted in the death of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Continental InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Rawlings v. ApodacaArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Quick v. CraneIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Pierringer v. HogerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. G&M Farms v. Funk Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Mallonee v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Brunobuilt v. StrataIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Simper v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  4. McKinley v. Guaranty National InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  5. McKinsey v. VernonIdaho Supreme Court · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API