Legal Opinion

Wolanski v. Mazgajczk

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 31, 1933No. 14,915PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtKime, C. J.

— On May 22, 1933, appellees herein filed a motion to dismiss this cause for the reason that appellant’s assignment of errors is in contravention of rule 6 of the Supreme and Appellate Courts, which says: “The assignment of errors shall contain the full names of all parties to the judgment, and process when necessary shall issue accordingly.” It is shown by said motion that the appellant, in the assignment of errors, is designated as “Walter M. Wolanski, Appellant,” whereas it manifestly appears from the face of the transcript that the party defendant to the judgment rendered below was Walter…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. SuttonIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Keiser v. HowardIndiana Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Bender v. State ex rel. HarnishIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Rohrbaugh v. LeasIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Miller v. Lahr's EstateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API