Legal Opinion

Baldwin v. Sutton

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1897No. 18,221PublishedCited by 17 opinions

From the Cáss Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtJordan, J.

The record in this appeal shows that appellant, plaintiff below, filed two amended paragraphs to his original complaint, being denominated as first and second. Under his first amended paragraph he demanded that the appellee, Hombnrg,. as sheriff, be restrained from paying over to appellee, Sntton, the money arising ont of the sale of certain real estate at sheriff’s sale. By the second, he demanded an accounting, and that appellee, Homburg, pay into court a certain amount of the proceeds of such sale, and that he be perpetually enjoined from paying said money over to Sutton. Appellee, Sutton,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stockwell v. State ex rel. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Peters v. BantaIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Chicago & Calumet Terminal Railway Co. v. EggersIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Hunter v. FitzmauriceIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Kissell v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Crawfordsville Trust Co. v. RamseyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. Lux & Talbott Stone Co. v. DonaldsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  3. State, ex rel. Shenk v. LungIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Vaill v. McPhailSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1912
  5. Chicago Terminal Transfer Railroad v. WaltonIndiana Supreme Court · 1905

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API