Legal Opinion

Rohrbaugh v. Leas

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 12, 1917No. 9,566PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Prom Dekalb Circuit Court; Emmet A. Bratton, Special Judge. Action by Earl D. Leas, administrator of tbe estate of Sarah A. Rohrbaugh, deceased, against Matilda Rohrbaugh. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals, and plaintiff moves to dismiss the appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBatman, J.

1. Appellee, under a special appearance, moves to dismiss this appeal on several grounds, only two of which we find it necessary to consider. The judgment below was rendered in favor of Earl D. Leas, as administrator of the estate of Sarah A. Rohrbaugh, deceased, against Matilda Rohrbaugh. The parties are designated in the assignment of errors: “Matilda Rohrbaugh, appellant, vs. Earl D. Leas, Administrator, appellee.” The rules of this court require that the assignment of errors shall contain the full names of the parties, and unless this rule is complied with the appeal will be dismissed.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Michigan Mutual Life Insurance v. FrankelIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Hancock v. Diamond Plate Glass Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Whisler v. WhislerIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  4. First National Bank v. Farmers & Merchants National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Penn American Plate Glass Co. v. PolingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Equitable Surety Co. v. TaylorIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Plotnicki v. NowickiIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. Merc. Com. B. T. Co., Tr. v. Dept. Fin. Inst.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1936
  4. Mercantile Commerce Bank & Trust Co. v. Department of Financial InstitutionsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1936
  5. Wolanski v. MazgajczkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API