Legal Opinion
Tuck v. Graves
District Court, S.D. California
Decided June 22, 2022No. 3:21-cv-02086Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROY TUCK, Case No.: 21cv2086-JO-JLB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 13 v. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND DIRECTING U.S. MARSHAL 14 JONATHON GRAVES; SAMUEL TO EFFECT SERVICE OF ROBISON; COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; 15 COMPLAINT AND SUMMONS and DOES 1 through 20, 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 Plaintiff Roy Tuck (“Plaintiff”), a non-prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights 22 complaint against Defendants Jonathon Graves, Samuel Robison, the County of San Diego, 23 and Does 1 through 20 (collectively,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bartlett v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Maria Escobedo v. Apple American GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Donald Robin BARREN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tom HARRINGTON, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Jesse J. Calhoun v. Donald N. Stahl James BrazeltonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.