Jesse J. Calhoun v. Donald N. Stahl James Brazelton
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
We review denial of leave to proceed in forma pauperis for an abuse of discretion. Minetti v. Port of Seattle, 152 F.3d 1113, 1115 (9th Cir.1998) (per curiam). Because Calhoun’s complaint sought monetary relief for actions taken in the course of employment by persons who are immune from suit, the district court properly denied in forma pauperis status. See Bogan v. Scott-Harris, 523 U.S. 44, 49, 118 S.Ct. 966, 140 L.Ed.2d 79 (1998) (legislators); Ashelman v. Pope, 793 F.2d 1072, 1075-76 (9th Cir.1986) (en banc) (judges and prosecutors).
Although Calhoun correctly contends that portions of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Donald Robin BARREN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tom HARRINGTON, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Kenneth O. Ashelman v. Hon. Gary Pope, Judge Division I, Mohave County Superior Court Mohave County Attorney's OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Bogan v. Scott-HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Page v. TorreyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Minetti v. Port of SeattleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
3Cited by1,226 opinions
- Nichols v. LoganDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2004
- Bylsma v. Hawaii Public Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2013
- Garber v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- (HC) Ali v. ConnorsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- (PC) Dresdner v. Sacramento County JailDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
1,221 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.