Legal Opinion
State v. Medina
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided March 28, 2019No. 20170328-CAPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MORTENSEN, Judge:
¶1 Because this case comes to us on interlocutory appeal, the following facts and allegations remain undetermined. "On interlocutory review, we recount the facts as alleged and in a light most favorable to the ruling below." State v. Stewart , 2018 UT 24 , ¶ 2 n.1, 438 P.3d 515 (cleaned up). A woman (Victim) was found fatally stabbed on the side of a road. The ensuing investigation led police to Sergio Briseno Medina. During an interview, detectives (Detectives) read Medina his Miranda rights. 2 Medina invoked his right to counsel, but immediately after invoking, Medina…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. MedinaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2025