Moore v. Capewell Horse Nail Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne. (Hosmer, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts, and points of counsel passed upon by the Court, are stated in the opinion. •
1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, C. J.
This suit is. assumpsit to recover for labor and services of the plaintiff rendered for the defendant, and, as the plaintiff claims, under a contract he made with the defendant for one year on or about the fifteenth day of March, 1887, the year to commence the thirtieth day of that month, and plaintiff was to have $75 per month or more, in the discretion of defendant’s agent, and plaintiff claims that he was discharged by defendant on the seventh day of November following. Plaintiff further claimed that there was a balance due him of $181.64 at that time.
It was the contention of defendant’s…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Grantham v. . GranthamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Ordon v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
- Faircloth v. . KenlawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Geistert v. SchefflerMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
- Vanderhoef v. Parker Bros. Co., Ltd.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.