Legal Opinion

Maritz Holdings, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London Subscribing to Policies Numbered B122FI0115 and FI0115116

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided November 30, 2020No. 4:18-cv-00825Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION MARITZ HOLDINGS INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) vs. ) Case No. 4:18-CV-00825 SEP ) CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT ) LLOYD’S LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO ) POLICIES NUMBERED B122F10115115 ) AND F10115116, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Defendant Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s London Subscribing to Policies Numbered B122F10115115 and F10115116’s (“Underwriters”) Motion to Dismiss Vexatious Refusal to Pay Claim of Plaintiff Maritz Holdings Inc.’s (“Maritz” or “Plaintiff”) Amended…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Hoopeston Canning Co. v. CullenSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Arthur Gallagher v. City of ClaytonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API