Legal Opinion

Moore v. State Highway Commission

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 8, 1939No. 34,346PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Thiele, J.:

Plaintiff brought an action to recover damages from the state highway commission. The trial court sustained a demurrer to her petition and she appeals to this court.

The question presented is whether a particular highway was defective within the meaning of G. S. 1935, 68-419, and the petition will be reviewed in view of that question.

It was alleged that about one-half mile west of Augusta, Kan., U. S. Highway No. 54, hereafter called the highway, which there runs east and west and is under the control and supervision of the defendant, is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bohm v. RacetteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  2. Phillips v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  3. Phillips v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  4. Douglas v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bradshaw v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Toumberlin v. HaasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  3. Barton v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Sheen v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  5. Blessman v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API