Legal Opinion

State v. Meadows

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 5, 2010No. COA08-1576PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STROUD, Judge.

Defendant was convicted by a jury of possession of cocaine and possession of drug paraphernalia. Defendant appeals on the grounds that the trial court erred by admitting expert testimony on the identity of a controlled substance based on the results of a NarTest machine. We find defendant’s argument as to the State’s failure to demonstrate the reliability of the NarTest machine to be dispositive, and we order a new trial.

I. Background

The State’s evidence tended to show that on the evening of 19 May 2007, Detective Jack Edward Springs of the Onslow County Sheriff’s Office was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Howerton v. Arai Helmet, Ltd.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  2. State v. RONALD LEE ROACHCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  2. State v. BurrowCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  3. State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  4. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  5. State v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API