Legal Opinion

State v. McDonald

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 4, 2011No. COA11-104PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HUNTER, Robert C., Judge.

Danny Ray McDonald (“defendant”) appeals his conviction for felony possession of cocaine. Defendant argues the trial court committed plain error in allowing the State’s expert witness, a forensic chemist, to testify to the results of his chemical analysis of the alleged controlled substance seized from defendant, and in admitting the expert’s laboratory report into evidence. Defendant contends the results of the chemical analysis were not admissible, because the testing was not performed by an accredited laboratory and the procedures utilized were not sufficiently…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Howerton v. Arai Helmet, Ltd.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  2. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  3. Hairston v. Alexander Tank & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. State v. PenningtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  5. Goodson v. P. H. Glatfelter Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. HalloranNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API