State v. Burrow
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HUNTER, JR., Robert N., Judge.
Jonathan Lynn Burrow (“Defendant”) appeals from a jury verdict finding him guilty of trafficking in oxycodone. Defendant argues the trial court violated his Sixth Amendment right of confrontation by allowing into evidence a non-testifying analyst’s forensic analysis report (the “SBI report”) and testimony of a detective regarding the results of the SBI report. Defendant also argues the trial court erred by denying his motion to dismiss for lack of substantial evidence to support the charges. We disagree that the trial court erred in denying Defendant’s motion to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. FritschSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. HarwoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- State v. BurrowCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- State v. EllisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2013
- State v. EllisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2013