Legal Opinion
Bark v. Usfs
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 4, 2020No. 19-35665PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT BARK; CASCADIA WILDLANDS; No. 19-35665 OREGON WILD, Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 3:18-cv-01645- v. MO UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, a federal agency, ORDER AND Defendant-Appellee, OPINION HIGH CASCADE, INC., Intervenor-Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael W. Mosman, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted December 10, 2019 Seattle, Washington Filed May 4, 2020 Before: Susan P. Graber, Marsha S. Berzon, and Stephen A. Higginson, * Circuit Judges. *…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Monsanto Co. v. Geertson Seed FarmsSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Blue Mountains Biodiversity Project v. BlackwoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- National Parks & Conservation Ass'n v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- League of Wilderness Defenders/Blue Mountains Biodiversity Project v. ConnaughtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Environmental Protection Information Center v. U.S. Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- American Wild Horse Campaign v. David BernhardtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- 350 Montana v. Debra HaalandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- City of Los Angeles v. FaaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Safari Club International v. Debra HaalandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Center for Community Action v. FaaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.